A twelve-month workload forecast, an interval review that measures how much tolerance each asset actually consumed and which way it drifts, and a recommendation to shorten, keep or extend — on deterministic, auditor-defensible arithmetic.
The AI drafts a week-by-week work plan as narrative; the maths stays deterministic. A drag-and-drop planner assigns technician by day. Due orders and customer due notices are generated automatically, service cycles recur, and the schedule is available as an ICS calendar feed. Multi-week capacity planning checks real due workload against technicians, benches and standards, with what-if hire, overtime or outsource scenarios and skill-gap detection.
Screens from the live platform, demo tenant. Click any screen to open it full size.
Twelve months of workload and the overdue backlog, by site and customer.
Per asset: tolerance consumed at as-found, drift direction, recommendation.
An interval change is e-signed and justified on the record.
AI-drafted weekly plan; the planner assigns technicians.
Due orders, quote chasing, customer due notices and service cycles run on the automation sweeper.




A twelve-month workload forecast, an interval review that measures how much tolerance each asset actually consumed and which way it drifts, and a recommendation to shorten, keep or extend — on deterministic, auditor-defensible arithmetic.
Move the drift and the interval. The suggestion keeps the projected drift inside the tolerance with the allowed risk margin — the logic behind the interval review.

Here the interval is tied to how the instrument actually behaved — its as-found history and drift — and a change is a signed, justified act.
The work plan is narrative for a person to accept. The interval maths is deterministic and reproducible.
The tour runs the working platform, not a mockup. Pilot on your own instruments with your own imported history — we set it up with you, and fixes ship in hours and days, not release cycles.